began 2009 years ago today with the birth of the Scriptural superhero Jesus Christ.

Is this something we really ought to be celebrating?

Aliester Crowley was a fraud too but at least he isn't responsible for 2000 years of slaughter, murder, rape, rapine, torture, and bigotry.

Can't wait for CrowleyMas.... wish he really were the prophet of the new aeon of Horus....

:>

...

I made level 14! I'm feeling pretty high and mighty today about that -- or maybe its just the pain medicine I'm taking for yet another kidney stone. I think it only took about two years.... anyways, despite my bitching on this page about some stupid review deletions... I'm still enjoying the site.

Its about time I cut down on the game playing though and got cracking on a few ideas of my own...

This message is to inform you that the following review, which you left for Chicks`N`Dicks 3 on 12/16/09 at 9:53:34 AM, has been deleted:

===============
Score: 6 / 10
Summary: it does not load properly
Review: and continuously throws errors... well, maybe it does load bu takes too long and does throw at least three errors while loading...

I think you need to get laid buddy. There comes a time in every mans life when cartoon porn... is just not enough.... for me that was 13 yrs of age.... for you it may be 31...
===============

Please review the review guidelines in the FAQ to ensure that you're following the rules and to prevent any further action being taken against other reviews you make.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

This was a review of a pornographic 'adult' game -- an animated puzzle depicting a penis sliding ina nd out of a vagina, amongst other things.

I'm no prude - I don't object to the genre although I have outgrown it. Its that newgrounds feels my review is objectionable as opposed to the content of "Chicks and Dicks part 3"

Go figure...

I have decided no longer to write reviews.

I have had numerous reviews -- none of which contained ANY objectionable content at all -- deleted for no apparent reason.

I'm tired of wasting my time.

Ng should dispense with the stupid M-Bot because it probably searches for ey words and phrases and is constantly taking them totally OUT OF CONTEXT.

Wake up -- bots are useful and neato kneato and everything but intelligent they are not and lack the sense for nuance required to police these reviews.,

Wait - now that gives me a novel idea, why not stop treating your users like 12 year olds and simply DONT play policeman at all with the review system???

After all, no ones review remains on screen more than a couple hours before it hits the bottom of the list and disappears offscreen. And who but the author reads more reviews than appear on screen?

If someone submits a piece of total spam, a total worthless piece of shit -- and everyone knows there is lots of that -- they ought to be able to take being told they have spammed us.